Solar Flood Light,Solar Flood Lights Outdoor,Solar Led Flood Lights,Led Flood Lights Waterproof Yantai LUHAO Lighting CO.,Ltd , https://www.luhaosolar.com
Used diatom mud formaldehyde is exceeded? lie?
With the rise in living standards, people's consumption habits have changed significantly. Environmental protection and low carbon living have become a major trend in home renovation. Among these eco-friendly materials, diatom mud has gained popularity, especially among young consumers.
Originating from Japan, diatom mud was introduced to the Chinese market in 2003. It is a natural wall decoration material designed to control indoor pollution. Made from diatomite formed over millions of years, it has strong adsorption and ion exchange properties, offering functions like odor removal, fire resistance, humidity regulation, formaldehyde decomposition, sterilization, insulation, energy saving, and noise reduction. As a result, it has become highly sought after.
However, the market for diatom mud is far from uniform. Prices vary greatly, and it’s difficult to distinguish genuine products from fake ones. This confusion has made many consumers hesitant to purchase, raising questions about whether "green paint" is just a marketing myth.
Chen Xinwen, a homeowner who used diatom mud three years ago, shared his experience. He chose it for its environmental benefits, believing it would protect his family's health. However, after testing, he found that the formaldehyde levels were dangerously high. When he confronted the seller, they claimed the diatom mud itself was formaldehyde-free, but the adhesive used during installation might be the source. This left Chen feeling deceived, forcing him to remove the entire coating and repaint with latex paint.
Reporters followed up on this issue by visiting several diatom mud stores in Hangzhou. Some sellers confirmed that real diatom mud doesn’t require glue, while others suggested Chen had purchased a counterfeit product. At one store, the salesperson insisted that true diatom mud only needs water to be applied directly to the wall, and that it can be demonstrated on-site.
Another brand explained that although most diatom mud contains some chemical additives like titanium dioxide and gelatin, these are used in small amounts to enhance performance without compromising safety. However, fake versions often use excessive chemical binders, which not only reduce the effectiveness of diatom mud but also release harmful gases over time.
The market for diatom mud is chaotic, with brands claiming to offer the best products, yet no clear standard exists. Consumers are left confused about what truly qualifies as an eco-friendly option. Prices vary widely, with some products priced as low as 50-60 yuan per square meter, while others cost hundreds more.
Despite their claims of being “breathable walls†or “natural and pollution-free,†few can provide verifiable proof of their environmental benefits. Many salespeople suggest professional testing after installation, but this adds extra stress for buyers.
Some brands emphasize the use of photocatalysts to enhance formaldehyde decomposition, while others claim that pure diatom mud naturally releases negative ions to purify the air. Others argue that chemical additives may block pores and cause secondary pollution.
Even more confusingly, some companies claim that real diatom mud cannot be reused once applied, as it degrades when mixed with water, potentially leading to bacterial growth. In contrast, others say that if a product can be scraped off and reused, it’s likely genuine.
As the market continues to grow, so do concerns about quality and transparency. For now, consumers remain cautious, unsure whether diatom mud is truly the eco-friendly solution it claims to be.